United States v. Vincent Kyle

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Vincent Kyle

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7705

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

VINCENT PERNELL KYLE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, District Judge. (1:08-cr-00035-GMW-PMS-4)

Submitted: February 23, 2012 Decided: February 28, 2012

Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Vincent Pernell Kyle, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Randall Ramseyer, Assistant United States Attorney, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Vincent Pernell Kyle appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Kyle,

No. 1:08-cr-00035-GMW-PMS-4 (W.D. Va. Dec. 6, 2011). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished