Michael Hunt v. Gladys Cassese

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Michael Hunt v. Gladys Cassese

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7742

MICHAEL EUGENE HUNT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

GLADYS CASSESE; PAUL TAYLOR; DON HUNT; ROSE LOCKLEAR; LT. HUGHES OXENDINE; HORACE C. SUTTON, JR.; SANDRA F. THOMAS; DR. PAUL SMITH,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. (5:10-ct-03132-D)

Submitted: February 17, 2012 Decided: February 29, 2012

Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Eugene Hunt, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth F. Parsons, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Michael Eugene Hunt appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2006) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Hunt v. Cassese, No. 5:10-ct-03132-D (E.D.N.C. Dec. 8,

2011). We deny Hunt’s motion for appointment of counsel. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished