U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

Michael Atwell v. American Sugar Refining

Michael Atwell v. American Sugar Refining
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 1, 2012

Michael Atwell v. American Sugar Refining

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-2187

MICHAEL L. ATWELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. AMERICAN SUGAR REFINING, INC., Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (1:10-cv-01378-WMN)

Submitted: February 24, 2012 Decided: March 1, 2012

Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael L. Atwell, Appellant Pro Se. Emmett F. McGee, Jr., Eileen Carr Riley, JACKSON LEWIS, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Michael L. Atwell appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellee on his employment discrimination claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Atwell’s pending motion to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm the judgment of the district court. Atwell v. Am. Sugar Refining, Inc., No. 1:10-cv-01378-WMN (D. Md. Sept. 27, 2011).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.