United States v. Carlos Perez-Fulgencio

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Carlos Perez-Fulgencio

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6045

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

CARLOS ALBERTO PEREZ-FULGENCIO,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (5:01-cr-30058-SGW-1)

Submitted: February 21, 2012 Decided: March 6, 2012

Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carlos Alberto Perez-Fulgencio, Appellant Pro Se. Grayson A. Hoffman, Jeb Thomas Terrien, Assistant United States Attorneys, Harrisonburg, Virginia; Ronald Mitchell Huber, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Carlos Perez-Fulgencio appeals the district court’s

order denying his

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Perez-Fulgencio, No. 5:01-cr-30058-SGW-1 (W.D. Va.

Dec. 1, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished