U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

United States v. Carlos Perez-Fulgencio

United States v. Carlos Perez-Fulgencio
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 6, 2012

United States v. Carlos Perez-Fulgencio

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6045

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. CARLOS ALBERTO PEREZ-FULGENCIO, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (5:01-cr-30058-SGW-1)

Submitted: February 21, 2012 Decided: March 6, 2012

Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carlos Alberto Perez-Fulgencio, Appellant Pro Se. Grayson A.

Hoffman, Jeb Thomas Terrien, Assistant United States Attorneys, Harrisonburg, Virginia; Ronald Mitchell Huber, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Carlos Perez-Fulgencio appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Perez-Fulgencio, No. 5:01-cr-30058-SGW-1 (W.D. Va. Dec. 1, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.