UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7340

THOMAS K. HOGGE,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

HARVARD STEPHENS, Dr., Chief Physician, Office of Health Services, sued individually and in official capacity; MANICKAVASAGER, Dr., Institutional Physician, Deerfield Correctional Center, sued individually and in official capacity; ALVIN HARRIS, Dr., Chief Institutional Physician (Past), Deerfield Correctional Center, sued individually and in official capacity; LINDA ROBB, Phlebotomist (Lab Technician), Powhatan Medical Unit (Receiving), sued individually and in official capacity; FRED SCHILLINGS, Director of Prison Health Services, sued individually and in official capacity,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

KEITH DAVIS, Warden, Deerfield Correctional Center, sued individually and in official capacity; BENITA BADGETTE, Healthcare Adm., Deerfield Correctional Center, sued individually and in official capacity; HOFFMAN, Dr., Institutional Physician, Deerfield Correctional Center, sued individually and in official capacity; AMONETTE, Dr., Chief Institutional Physician, Powhatan Receiving Unit, sued individually and in official capacity; MARY JOHNSON, Registered Nurse, Deerfield Correctional Center, sued individually and in official capacity; FRED SCHILLING,

Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:09-cv-00582-JRS)

Submitted: February 29, 2012 Decided: March 13, 2012

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas K. Hogge, Appellant Pro Se. Mark R. Davis, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Rosalie Fessier, TIMBERLAKE, SMITH, THOMAS & MOSES, PC, Staunton, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Thomas Kevin Hogge appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his

(2006) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Hogge v. Stephens, No. 3:09-cv-00582-JRS (E.D. Va. Sept.

24, 2010; June 1, Sept. 6 & 16, 2011). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3