Joseph Sun v. Joe Loadholt

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Joseph Sun v. Joe Loadholt

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-2292

JOSEPH C. SUN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JOE L. LOADHOLT,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

STACEY SMITH,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Richard M. Gergel, District Judge. (9:08-cv-04021-RMG)

Submitted: March 7, 2012 Decided: March 13, 2012

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph C. Sun, Appellant Pro Se. Darrell Thomas Johnson, Jr.; Warren Johnson, Hardeeville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Joseph C. Sun appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2006) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Sun v. Loadholt, No. 9:08-cv-04021-RMG (D.S.C. Nov. 1,

2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished