Joseph Sun v. Joe Loadholt
Joseph Sun v. Joe Loadholt
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-2292
JOSEPH C. SUN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JOE L. LOADHOLT, Defendant - Appellee, and STACEY SMITH, Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Richard M. Gergel, District Judge. (9:08-cv-04021-RMG)
Submitted: March 7, 2012 Decided: March 13, 2012
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph C. Sun, Appellant Pro Se. Darrell Thomas Johnson, Jr.; Warren Johnson, Hardeeville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Joseph C. Sun appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sun v. Loadholt, No. 9:08-cv-04021-RMG (D.S.C. Nov. 1, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.