Salame Amr v. Eddie Moore, Jr.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Salame Amr v. Eddie Moore, Jr.

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-2196

SALAME M. AMR,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

EDDIE N. MOORE, JR.; LARRY C. BROWN; KEITH M. WILLIAMSON; NASSER RASHIDI; GERALD BURTON; DONNA CRAWFORD; GLORIA YOUNG; ALI MOHAMED; OLIVER W. HILL, JR.; WONDI MERSIE; ANDREW KANU; STEPHAN WILDEUS; SHARON EVANS; AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION; AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR UNIVERSITY PROFESSORS; VIRGINIA STATE UNIVERSITY BOARD OF VISITORS, THE,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:09-cv-00667-REP)

Submitted: March 15, 2012 Decided: March 19, 2012

Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Salame M. Amr, Appellant Pro Se. Gregory Clayton Fleming, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Robert R. Musick, THOMPSON MCMULLAN, PC, Richmond, Virginia; Jeremy David Capps, HARMAN, CLAYTOR, CORRIGAN & WELLMAN, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Salame M. Amr appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave

to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the

reasons stated by the district court. Amr v. Moore, No. 3:09-

cv-00667-REP (E.D. Va. Sept. 26, 2011). Amr’s pending motion to

stay is denied as moot. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished