U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

Salame Amr v. Attorney General of Virginia

Salame Amr v. Attorney General of Virginia
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 19, 2012

Salame Amr v. Attorney General of Virginia

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-2171

SALAME M. AMR, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA; GREGORY C. FLEMING; RONALD N. REGNERY; SCOTT CROWLEY; CROWLEY & CROWLEY LAW FIRM, Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:11-cv-00423-REP)

Submitted: March 15, 2012 Decided: March 19, 2012

Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Salame M. Amr, Appellant Pro Se. George Walerian Chabalewski, Catherine Crooks Hill, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Scott Gregory Crowley, Sr., CROWLEY & CROWLEY, Glen Allen, Virginia; Charles James Williams, III, BURNETT & WILLIAMS, Midlothian, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Salame M. Amr appeals the district court’s orders granting the Defendants’ motions to dismiss and for sanctions.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court.

Amr v. Attorney Gen. of Va., No. 3:11-cv-00423-REP (E.D. Va. Sept. 22-23 & 26, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.