Edward Spears v. Florence Magistrate Court
Edward Spears v. Florence Magistrate Court
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1025
EDWARD R. SPEARS, a/k/a Edward Rodney Spears, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. FLORENCE MAGISTRATE COURT, civil dept; JUDGE NEON LANGELY; JUDGE EUGENE COOPER; CONSTABLE MARY EADDY, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:11-cv-01717-TLW)
Submitted: March 15, 2012 Decided: March 20, 2012
Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edward Spears, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Edward R. Spears appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Spears v. Florence Magistrate Court, No. 4:11-cv-01717-TLW (D.S.C. Oct.
17, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.