U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

Denise Severino-Todd v. Wal-Mart, Inc.

Denise Severino-Todd v. Wal-Mart, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 3, 2012

Denise Severino-Todd v. Wal-Mart, Inc.

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1095

DENISE L. SEVERINO-TODD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WAL-MART, INC., Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (5:11-cv-00336-BR)

Submitted: March 29, 2012 Decided: April 3, 2012

Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Denise L. Severino-Todd, Appellant Pro Se. Julie Kerr Adams, Angela Byrd Cummings, LITTLER MENDELSON PC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Denise L. Severino-Todd appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendant’s motion to dismiss her employment discrimination action pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-2000e-17 (West 2003 & Supp. 2010). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Severino-Todd v. Wal-Mart, Inc., No. 5:11-cv- 336-BR (E.D.N.C. Dec. 20, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.