U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

Charles Witt v. Dr. Chaundry

Charles Witt v. Dr. Chaundry
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 3, 2012

Charles Witt v. Dr. Chaundry

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7740

CHARLES W. WITT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DR. CHAUNDRY, Director Medical; RYAN ERWIN, Security Officer; OFFICER ABDUSSLOAM, Security Officer, Defendants – Appellees, and STEPHEN M. HERRICK, Acting Director V.C.B.R.; CHAD HOUSER, Director of Security; DUNCAN BENTON, Transportation Security Officer, Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:10-cv-01164-LO-IDD)

Submitted: March 29, 2012 Decided: April 3, 2012

Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles W. Witt, Appellant Pro Se. Rosalie Fessier, TIMBERLAKE, SMITH, THOMAS & MOSES, PC, Staunton, Virginia; Rachel Joan Baer, Allyson Kurzmann Tysinger, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Charles W. Witt appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and granting summary judgment to Defendants. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Witt v. Chaundry, No. 1:10-cv-01164-LO-IDD (E.D. Va. Dec. 9, 2011). We deny Witt’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.