U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

Howell Woltz v. FCI Beckley

Howell Woltz v. FCI Beckley
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 3, 2012

Howell Woltz v. FCI Beckley

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7470

HOWELL W. WOLTZ, TEP, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. FCI BECKLEY; FPC BECKLEY; JOHN GRIMES, Counselor; BEVERLY SMITH, Case Manager; JAMES CHILDRESS, Case & Unit Manager; M. LEWIS, Unit Secretary; GARY LOCKE, Secretary of the United States Department of Commerce, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Irene C. Berger, District Judge. (5:10-cv-00487)

Submitted: March 29, 2012 Decided: April 3, 2012

Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Howell W. Woltz, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Howell W. Woltz, TEP, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2006) his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Woltz v. FCI Beckley, No. 5:10-cv-00487 (S.D.W. Va. Oct. 17, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.