U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

United States v. Harlando Carr

United States v. Harlando Carr
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 11, 2012

United States v. Harlando Carr

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6242

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. HARLANDO OMAR CARR, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:96-cr-00020-H-1)

Submitted: April 2, 2012 Decided: April 11, 2012

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Matthew Gridley Pruden, TIN, FULTON, WALKER & OWEN, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Jennifer P. May- Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Harlando Omar Carr appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Legree, 205 F.3d 724, 728-29 (4th Cir. 2000); United States v. Carr, No. 5:96-cr-00020-H-1 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 26, 2012). We deny the motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.