Simhah Tamar v. Geico Casualty Company
Simhah Tamar v. Geico Casualty Company
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-2395
SIMHAH TAMAR, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY; GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY; GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY; GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:10-cv-01067-CMH-IDD)
Submitted: April 19, 2012 Decided: April 24, 2012
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Simhah Tamar, Appellant Pro Se. Joel Jacob Borovsky, JACKSON LEWIS, LLP, Reston, Virginia; Bruce Stephen Harrison, Fiona W.
Ong, SHAWE & ROSENTHAL, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Simhah Tamar appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing her employment discrimination suit. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tamar v. Geico Cas. Co., No. 1:10-cv-01067-CMH-IDD (E.D. Va. Oct. 18, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.