U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

Alicia Dennis v. Bank United

Alicia Dennis v. Bank United
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 24, 2012

Alicia Dennis v. Bank United

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-2106

ALICIA M. DENNIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BANK UNITED, Assignee of FDIC as Receiver for Bank United, FSB; BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL ASSOCIATION; BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP, Defendants – Appellees, and STEVEN HAROLD GREENFELD, Chapter 7 Trustee, Trustee.

No. 11-2109

ALICIA M. DENNIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION; S. PRINCE AURORA, as Trustee for Aurora Mortgage; JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Defendants – Appellees, and STEVEN HAROLD GREENFELD, Chapter 7 Trustee, Trustee.

No. 11-2110

ALICIA M. DENNIS,

Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL ASSOCIATION; BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP, Defendants – Appellees, and STEVEN HAROLD GREENFELD, Chapter 7 Trustee, Trustee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District Judge. (8:10-cv-03147-RWT; 8:10-cv-03151-RWT; 8:10-cv-03152- RWT; 09-33957 WIL; 10-00303 WIL; 10-00304 WIL; 10-00305 WIL)

Submitted: April 19, 2012 Decided: April 24, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alicia M. Dennis, Appellant Pro Se. John Sears Simcox, SIMCOX & BARCLAY, Annapolis, Maryland; S. Prince Aurora, Vienna, Virginia, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Alicia M. Dennis appeals the district court’s orders affirming the bankruptcy court’s orders dismissing her complaint filed in the underlying bankruptcy proceeding. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dennis v. Bank United, Dennis v. U.S. Bank, National Assoc., Dennis v. Bank of America NA, Nos. 8:10- cv-03147-RWT; 8:10-cv-03151-RWT; 8:10-cv-03152-RWT; 09-33957 WIL; 10-00303 WIL; 10-00304 WIL; 10-00305 WIL (D. Md. Sept. 9, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.