U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

United States v. Sidney Kenneth Mitchell

United States v. Sidney Kenneth Mitchell
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 25, 2012

United States v. Sidney Kenneth Mitchell

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6026

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. SIDNEY KENNETH MITCHELL, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey, Chief District Judge. (3:06-cr-00068-JPB-1)

Submitted: April 19, 2012 Decided: April 25, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sidney Kenneth Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Sidney Kenneth Mitchell appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Mitchell, No. 3:06-cr- 00068-JPB-1 (N.D.W. Va. Dec. 16, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.