U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

Eugene Harrison v. T. Brown

Eugene Harrison v. T. Brown
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 25, 2012

Eugene Harrison v. T. Brown

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1142

EUGENE P. HARRISON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. T. BROWN, Sergeant, Detective, Taevor; ROBERT BURNISH, Sergeant; JERRY KELLY, Corporal; SIMON MAJOR, Sumter Lee Detention Center President; JON OZMINT, South Carolina Department of Correction, Defendants – Appellees, and SUMTER COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT; SUMTER LEE DETENTION CENTER; SCDC COMMISSIONER; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (3:10-cv-02642-RMG)

Submitted: April 19, 2012 Decided: April 25, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam.

Eugene P. Harrison, Appellant Pro Se. James M. Davis, Jr., Joel Steve Hughes, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, Edgar Lloyd Willcox, II, WILLCOX BUYCK & WILLIAMS, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Eugene P. Harrison appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Harrison v. Brown, No. 3:10-cv-02642-RMG (D.S.C. Jan. 24, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.