U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

Michael Pitts v. Richard Glasser

Michael Pitts v. Richard Glasser
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 30, 2012 · Agee, Gregory, Per Curiam, Wynn
472 F. App'x 209

Michael Pitts v. Richard Glasser

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Michael Eugene Pitts, Arthur Eugene Pitts, Jr., Debra Lynn Pitts-Ryles, and Stephanie Pitts-Evans appeal the district court’s order granting the Defendants’ motion to dismiss their civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pitts v. Glasser, No. 2:11-cv-00337-MSDDEM (E.D.Va. Dec. 23, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.