Andersson Gustafsson v. Ralph Genuario
Andersson Gustafsson v. Ralph Genuario
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-2300
ANDERSSON GUSTAFSSON ADVOKATBYRA KB, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. RALPH D. GENUARIO; DR. MAIJA HARKONEN; JOHN PACKARD, Defendants – Appellees, and ESCRUB SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O'Grady, District Judge. (1:10-cv-00632-LO-TRJ)
Submitted: April 30, 2012 Decided: May 9, 2012
Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Michael Holm, LECLAIR RYAN, PC, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Ralph D. Genuario, Alexandria, Virginia; Dr. Maija Harkonen, Alexandria, Virginia, Appellees Pro Se. Eric J.
Berghold, Robert H. J. Loftus, MCCANDLISH & LILLARD, PC, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellee John Packard.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Andersson Gustafsson Advokatbyra KB appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment in favor of Appellee John Packard on the Appellant’s claim of misrepresentation, denying default judgment against Appellees Ralph Genuario and Maija Harkonen and dismissing the Appellant’s claims against them, and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Advokatbyra KB v. Genuario, No. 1:10-cv-00632-LO-TRJ (E.D. Va. Sept. 7 & 26, 2011; Oct. 24, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.