U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

Minh Hoang v. Gary Rosen

Minh Hoang v. Gary Rosen
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 25, 2012

Minh Hoang v. Gary Rosen

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1006

In Re: MINH VU HOANG, Debtor. ---------------------- MINH VU HOANG, Debtor – Appellant, v. GARY A. ROSEN; ROGER SCHLOSSBERG, Trustees - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District Judge. (8:11-cv-03431-DKC; 05-21078)

Submitted: May 21, 2012 Decided: May 25, 2012

Before KING, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Minh Vu Hoang, Appellant Pro Se. Gary A. Rosen, Rockville, Maryland; Roger Schlossberg, SCHLOSSBERG & ASSOCIATES, Hagerstown, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Minh Vu Hoang appeals the district court’s order dismissing as interlocutory her appeal from the bankruptcy court’s orders authorizing the employment of certain financial professionals in the underlying bankruptcy proceeding. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Hoang v. Rosen (In Re: Minh Vu Hoang), Nos. 8:11-cv-03431-DKC; 05-21078 (D. Md. July 11, 2011; Dec. 1, 2011; Dec. 14, 2011).

In light of this disposition, we deny as moot the motion to intervene. We deny Hoang’s motion for appointment of counsel, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.