Marvin Jones v. Wal-Mart
Marvin Jones v. Wal-Mart
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1301
MARVIN KIMBLE JONES, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. WAL-MART; SAM’S CLUB; STEVEN PAZERDSKI, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. (8:10-cv-00988-JMC)
Submitted: May 24, 2012 Decided: May 30, 2012
Before MOTZ and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marvin Kimble Jones, Appellant Pro Se. William Keefer Brumbach, III, LITTLER MENDELSON PC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Marvin Kimble Jones appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil action under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b)(2)(A)(v) and 41(b) for failure to comply with Defendants’ discovery requests as ordered. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jones v. Wal-Mart, No. 8:10-cv-00988-JMC (D.S.C. Mar. 2, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.