U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

United States v. Cedrick Snipes

United States v. Cedrick Snipes
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 6, 2012

United States v. Cedrick Snipes

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6375

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CEDRICK L. SNIPES, a/k/a Cederick L. Snipes, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior District Judge. (2:05-cr-00718-PMD-1)

Submitted: May 31, 2012 Decided: June 6, 2012

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cedrick L. Snipes, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Thomas Phillips, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Cedrick L. Snipes appeals the district court’s order denying his motion seeking a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error, given that Snipes is ineligible for the reduction that he seeks. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. United States v. Snipes, No. 2:05-cr-00718- PMD-1 (D.S.C. Feb. 13, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.