U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

Fredrick Stinson v. Michael Allen

Fredrick Stinson v. Michael Allen
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 6, 2012

Fredrick Stinson v. Michael Allen

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6152

FREDRICK STINSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MICHAEL ALLEN, Circuit Court Judge; LARRY STEVEN HOGAN, Deputy Commonwealth Attorney, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:11-cv-01364-LMB-JFA)

Submitted: May 31, 2012 Decided: June 6, 2012

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Fredrick Stinson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Fredrick Stinson appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) civil rights action. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).

Because Stinson’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Stinson has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.