U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

Brad Johnson v. Randall Bryant

Brad Johnson v. Randall Bryant
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 6, 2012

Brad Johnson v. Randall Bryant

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1055

BRAD R. JOHNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RANDALL BRYANT; DORIS CUBITT, CPA; MALANE S. PIKE, Esq.; MARK T. HOBBS, CPA; GARY F. FORTE; BOBBY R. CREECH, JR., CPA; DONALD H. BURKETT, CPA; ANTHONY A. CALLANDER, CPA; WENDELL LUNSFORD, PA; JOHN F. CAMP, CPA, Defendants – Appellees, and HENRY D. MCMASTER, Defendant.

No. 12-1057

BRAD R. JOHNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DORIS CUBITT, CPA; A. ABLE, CPA; B. BAKER, CPA; C. CHARLIE, CPA, Defendants – Appellees, and LEWIS V. HALL, Defendant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia and Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (3:09-cv-00102-TLW; 4:08-cv-02726-TLW)

Submitted: May 18, 2012 Decided: June 6, 2012

Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Brad R. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Jerome Scott Kozacki, WILLCOX BUYCK & WILLIAMS, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Brad R. Johnson appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment to the Appellants and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the records and the district court’s orders and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. See Johnson v. Bryant, Nos. 3:09-cv-00102-TLW; 4:08-cv-02726-TLW (D.S.C. Sept.

28, 2011; Dec. 14, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.