U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

United States v. John Banks

United States v. John Banks
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 15, 2012

United States v. John Banks

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6297

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JOHN FRANKLIN BANKS, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. James P. Jones, District Judge. (3:97-cr-00086-JPJ-1)

Submitted: June 7, 2012 Decided: June 15, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Franklin Banks, Appellant Pro Se. Anthony Paul Giorno, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: John Franklin Banks appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Banks, No. 3:97-cr-00086-JPJ-1 (W.D. Va. Feb. 3, 2012). We grant Banks’ motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.