Hammel Clark v. Kathyrn Jacobs
Hammel Clark v. Kathyrn Jacobs
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6402
HAMMEL J. CLARK, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. KATHYRN J. JACOBS, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:11- cv-01555-RWT)
Submitted: June 14, 2012 Decided: June 19, 2012
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Hammel J. Clark, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Alexander Hinrichs, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Pikesville, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Hammel J. Clark appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Clark v. Jacobs, No. 8:11-cv-01555-RWT (D. Md. Feb. 21, 2012). We deny Clark’s pending motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.