U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

United States v. Booker Law, III

United States v. Booker Law, III
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 20, 2012 · Wilkinson, Niemeyer, Keenan
474 F. App'x 205

United States v. Booker Law, III

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Booker Travis Law, III, appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Law, No. 4:07-cr-00640-RBH-1 (D.S.C. Apr. 26, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.