U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

Whitney Lassiter v. Huntington Ingalls Industries

Whitney Lassiter v. Huntington Ingalls Industries
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 21, 2012

Whitney Lassiter v. Huntington Ingalls Industries

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1162

WHITNEY LASSITER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (4:11-cv-00101-RAJ-DEM)

Submitted: June 11, 2012 Decided: June 21, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Whitney Lassiter, Appellant Pro Se. Scott William Kezman, Mark Edward Warmbier, KAUFMAN & CANOLES, PC, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Whitney Lassiter appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment and dismissing her claims and denying her motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lassiter v. Huntington Ingalls Indus., Inc., No. 4:11-cv-00101-RAJ-DEM (E.D. Va. Jan.

10, 2012). We grant Lassiter’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.