Carl Wiley v. Buncombe County
Carl Wiley v. Buncombe County
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6513
CARL EDWARD WILEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BUNCOMBE COUNTY; VAN DUNCAN, Individually and official capacities and Buncombe County Detention Facility; K.
HANSEN, Individually and official capacities, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:10-cv-00181-RJC)
Submitted: June 21, 2012 Decided: June 26, 2012
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Carl Edward Wiley, Appellant Pro Se. Curtis William Euler, BUNCOMBE COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Asheville, North Carolina; David John Adinolfi, II, Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Carl Edward Wiley appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny Wiley’s motion for appointment of counsel and his motion for application for appearance of counsel form, bar admission, and ECF registration form, and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wiley v. Buncombe Cnty., No. 1:10-cv-00181-RJC (W.D.N.C. Mar. 2, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.