Mauricio Weber v. Melissa Aiken-Partain
Mauricio Weber v. Melissa Aiken-Partain
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6468
MAURICIO E. WEBER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SGT. MELISSA AIKEN-PARTAIN; DETECTIVE MIKE AIKEN; OFFICER MICHAEL ROBERSON; SGT. KEITH BAGWELL; OFFICER TREVOR SIMMONS; RETENTION OFFICER JOEY CHAPMAN; LIEUTENANT JOHN ZAMBERLIN; INVESTIGATOR MIKE BASKINS; SOLICITOR CHRISSY J.
ADAMS; ASSISTANT SOLICITOR KRISTIN REEVES; PUBLIC DEFENDER ROBERT A. GAMBLE; ATTORNEY JOY CHAVIS; CLERK OF COURT RICHARD A. SHIRLEY; CLERK OF COURT DANIEL E. SHEAROUSE; SECURITY OFFICER JOHN DOE; SECURITY OFFICER JOHN TWO DOE; DIRECTOR JEFFERY MUSICK, Forensic Evaluation Service; DOCTOR RICHARD L. FRIERSON; SOCIAL WORKER DORIS A. TAYLOR, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (8:11-cv-02423-GRA)
Submitted: June 21, 2012 Decided: June 26, 2012
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mauricio E. Weber, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Mauricio E. Weber appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Weber v. Aiken-Partain, No. 8:11-cv-02423-GRA (D.S.C. Feb. 15, 2012). We deny Weber’s motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.