U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

United States v. Gregory Hipps

United States v. Gregory Hipps
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 23, 2012 · Duncan, Agee, Wynn
474 F. App'x 396

United States v. Gregory Hipps

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gregory Lee Hipps appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hipps, No. 2:96-cr-00208-RAJ-l (E.D.Va. Feb. 17, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.