Timothy Claridy v. United States
Timothy Claridy v. United States
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6644
TIMOTHY CLARIDY, Petitioner - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:11-cv-01620-RDB)
Submitted: July 19, 2012 Decided: July 26, 2012
Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Timothy Claridy, Appellant Pro Se. Philip S. Jackson, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Timothy Claridy appeals the district court’s order dismissing as moot his motion for the return of property. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Claridy v. United States, No. 1:11-cv-01620-RDB (D. Md. Mar. 28, 2012). We further grant Claridy’s motion to file exhibits to his informal brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.