Pepi Schafler v. Scott Field
Pepi Schafler v. Scott Field
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1430
DR. PEPI SCHAFLER, Plaintiff – Appellant, v.
SCOTT D. FIELD, Esq.; KENNETH OESTREICHER, Esq.; REZNICK, FEDDER & SILVERMAN; WHITEFORD, TAYLOR & PRESTON; DENNIS D.
DAVIS, Esq.; RICHARD J. SPEAR, Esq.; GOLDBERG, STINNET et al, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:12-cv-00715-PJM)
Submitted: July 26, 2012 Decided: August 1, 2012
Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Pepi Schafler, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Pepi Schafler appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint alleging civil conspiracy. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Schafler v. Field, No. 8:12-cv-00715-PJM (D. Md. Mar. 20, 2012).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.