U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

Pammalla Uplinger v. Rees Broome

Pammalla Uplinger v. Rees Broome
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 1, 2012

Pammalla Uplinger v. Rees Broome

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1289

PAMMALLA SHANNON UPLINGER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. REES BROOME, P.C., Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:11-cv-01270-TSE-IDD; 09-13129-BFK; 10-01325- BFK)

Submitted: July 26, 2012 Decided: August 1, 2012

Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Pammalla Shannon Uplinger, Appellant Pro Se. Robert E. Draim, Amanda Murray Schwartz, HUDGINS LAW FIRM, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Pammalla Shannon Uplinger appeals the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order granting summary judgment for Defendant in her action filed pursuant to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692-1692p (2006).

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, although we grant Uplinger’s motions to take judicial notice and to supplement the record, we affirm for the reasons stated by the lower courts. Uplinger v. Rees Broome, P.C., Nos. 1:11-cv-01270-TSE-IDD; 09-13129-BFK; 10-01325-BFK (E.D. Va. Feb. 8, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.