Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Donovan Robert Bradley appeals the district court’s order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence reduction. We review an order granting or denying a § 3582 motion for a sentence reduction for abuse of discretion. *907 See United States v. Munn, 595 F.3d 183, 186 (4th Cir. 2010) (citing United States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir. 2004)). “A district court abuses its discretion if it ... bases its exercise of discretion on an erroneous factual or legal premise.” DIRECTV, Inc. v. Rawlins, 523 F.3d 318, 323 (4th Cir. 2008) (citing James v. Jacobson, 6 F.3d 233, 239 (4th Cir. 1993)). We have thoroughly reviewed the record and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in reducing Bradley’s sentence. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.