U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

Curtis King v. Jon Ozmint

Curtis King v. Jon Ozmint
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 7, 2012

Curtis King v. Jon Ozmint

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6648

CURTIS L. KING, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JON OZMINT; WARDEN CARTLEDGE; MAJOR LEWIS; CAPT. MURSIER; LT. STEVEN; LT. CROUTCH; SGT. MACKY; SGT. WRIT; OFC.

CURHLEY; DR. MCCREE; RN CRAWFORD; RN ANDREW; RN BLACK; MALE OFFICER YOUNG; CYNTHIA CHERNECKI, Defendants - Appellees, and SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Known and unknown officials in official and individual capacity security medical, Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (0:11-cv-01455-TLW-PJG)

Submitted: July 9, 2012 Decided: August 7, 2012

Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Curtis L. King, Appellant Pro Se. Brian E. Sopp, BARNES, ALFORD, STORK & JOHNSON, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Curtis L. King seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order King seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.