U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

United States v. Christopher Mitchell

United States v. Christopher Mitchell
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 20, 2012

United States v. Christopher Mitchell

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6817

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CHRISTOPHER MITCHELL, a/k/a Hassan Jones, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr., District Judge. (2:90-cr-00020-2)

Submitted: August 9, 2012 Decided: August 20, 2012

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se. John J. Frail, Steven Loew, Assistant United States Attorneys, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Christopher Mitchell appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Mitchell, No. 2:90-cr- 00020-2 (S.D. W. Va. Apr. 18, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.