H. Laskey v. State of Maryland
H. Laskey v. State of Maryland
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1717
H. LEIGHTON LASKEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STATE OF MARYLAND; CITY OF BALTIMORE; BALTIMORE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT; BALTIMORE CITY FALSE ALARM REDUCTION PROGRAM; BALTIMORE CITY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT; JOSEPH B. JOHNSON, Program Manager, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, District Judge. (1:12-cv-00945-JKB)
Submitted: August 16, 2012 Decided: August 20, 2012
Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
H. Leighton Laskey, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: H. Leighton Laskey appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. * Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Laskey v. Maryland, No. 1:12-cv-00945-JKB (D. Md. May 23, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* Although Laskey’s pleadings reference the Equal Protection Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment Privileges and Immunities Clause, we conclude his pleadings fall far short of establishing a cognizable claim under either clause.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.