U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

Janet White v. Michael Astrue

Janet White v. Michael Astrue
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 20, 2012

Janet White v. Michael Astrue

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1486

JANET MILLER WHITE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (3:11-cv-400-MOC-DSC)

Submitted: August 16, 2012 Decided: August 20, 2012

Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Janet Miller White, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa G. Smoller, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Boston, Massachusetts, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Janet Miller White appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and affirming the Commissioner’s decision to deny White supplemental security income. We must uphold the decision to deny benefits if the decision is supported by substantial evidence and the correct law was applied. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (2006); Johnson v. Barnhart, 434 F.3d 650, 653 (4th Cir. 2005) (per curiam). We have thoroughly reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. White v. Astrue, No. 3:11-cv-400-MOC-DSC (W.D.N.C. Mar. 30, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.