U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

Billy McDowell v. Nucor Building System

Billy McDowell v. Nucor Building System
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 20, 2012

Billy McDowell v. Nucor Building System

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1399

BILLY MCDOWELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NUCOR BUILDING SYSTEM, Defendant – Appellee, and JOHN HUTTO, Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, Chief District Judge. (3:10-cv-00172-MBS)

Submitted: August 16, 2012 Decided: August 20, 2012

Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Billy McDowell, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Michelle Guerra, John K.

Linker, Jeffrey S. Mayes, ALANIZ AND SCHRAEDER, Houston, Texas; Nosizi Ralephata, John Smith Wilkerson, III, TURNER, PADGET, GRAHAM & LANEY, PA, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Billy McDowell appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and granting summary judgment for Nucor Building System in this employment discrimination case. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McDowell v. Nucor Bldg. Sys., No. 3:10- cv-00172-MBS (D.S.C. Feb. 29, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.