Gary Gray v. Wittstadt Title and Escrow
Gary Gray v. Wittstadt Title and Escrow
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1251
GARY M. GRAY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WITTSTADT TITLE AND ESCROW COMPANY LLC; MORRIS/ HARDWICK/ SCHNEIDER; ONE WEST BANK, FSB, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Mark S. Davis, District Judge. (4:11-cv-00111-MSD-TEM)
Submitted: August 16, 2012 Decided: August 20, 2012
Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gary M. Gray, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Roger Hildebeidel, MORRIS HARDWICK SCHNEIDER, PLLC, Dulles, Virginia; Amy Elizabeth Miller, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, McLean, Virginia; Anand Vijay Ramana, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Washington, DC, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Gary M. Gray appeals the district court’s dismissal of his complaint and its denial of his post-judgment motions to amend the judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) and to amend the complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gray v. Wittstadt Title & Escrow Co., No. 4:11- cv-00111-MSD-TEM (E.D. Va., Nov. 28, 2011, Jan. 25, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.