U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

Steven Morales v. Officer Richardson

Steven Morales v. Officer Richardson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 29, 2012

Steven Morales v. Officer Richardson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1324

STEVEN MORALES; LUCIANO MORALES, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. OFFICER DOMINIQUE RICHARDSON, Badge No. 3066; PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY, MARYLAND, a body corporate and politic, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (8:11-cv-03215-JFM)

Submitted: August 2, 2012 Decided: August 29, 2012

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terrell N. Roberts, III, ROBERTS & WOOD, Riverdale, Maryland, for Appellants. Tonia Y. Belton-Gofreed, PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY OFFICE OF LAW, Upper Marlboro, Maryland; Daniel Karp, Russell Gray, KARPINSKI, COLARESI & KARP, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Steven Morales appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) claims and its subsequent order denying his motion to amend the judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Morales v. Richardson, No. 8:11-cv-03215-JFM (D. Md. Jan. 30, 2012; Mar. 6, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.