U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

Boyd Mize v. Stephen Herrick

Boyd Mize v. Stephen Herrick
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 30, 2012

Boyd Mize v. Stephen Herrick

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6543

BOYD MIZE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STEPHEN M. HERRICK, Acting Director; DOCTOR MILITANA, M.D., Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:10-cv-01124-GBL-TRJ)

Submitted: August 20, 2012 Decided: August 30, 2012

Before AGEE, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Boyd Mize, Appellant Pro Se. Allyson Kurzmann Tysinger, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Rosalie Fessier, TIMBERLAKE, SMITH, THOMAS & MOSES, PC, Staunton, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Boyd Mize appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mize v. Herrick, No. 1:10-cv-01124-GBL-TRJ (E.D. Va. Mar. 2, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.