U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

James Tinsley v. Brian Wight

James Tinsley v. Brian Wight
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 11, 2012 · Niemeyer, Per Curiam, Shedd, Wynn
478 F. App'x 15

James Tinsley v. Brian Wight

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James Douglas Tinsley appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tinsley v. Wight, No. 7:09-cv02455-SB (D.S.C. Mar. 28, 2012) We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.