U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

Edward Saunders, Jr. v. Kenneth Lay

Edward Saunders, Jr. v. Kenneth Lay
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 12, 2012

Edward Saunders, Jr. v. Kenneth Lay

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6883

EDWARD HAROLD SAUNDERS, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. KENNETH E. LAY, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:11-cv-00566-BO)

Submitted: September 4, 2012 Decided: September 12, 2012

Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edward Harold Saunders, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Edward Harold Saunders, Jr. appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Saunders v. Lay, No. 5:11-cv-00566-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 20, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.