U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

United States v. Joseph Monroe

United States v. Joseph Monroe
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 14, 2012

United States v. Joseph Monroe

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7214

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JOSEPH EDWARDS MONROE, a/k/a Slim, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (3:94-cr-00041-NKM-BWC-4)

Submitted: September 11, 2012 Decided: September 14, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph Edwards Monroe, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy Spodick Healey, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Joseph Edwards Monroe appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Monroe, No. 3:94-cr-00041-NKM-BWC-4 (W.D. Va. July 9, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.