U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

Michael Scott v. Lender Processing Services, Inc.

Michael Scott v. Lender Processing Services, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 17, 2012

Michael Scott v. Lender Processing Services, Inc.

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1586

MICHAEL A. SCOTT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, INC.; FIDELITY NATIONAL INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.; DOCX LLC; US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION; DLJ MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC.; WELLS FARGO BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION; MERSCORP, INC.; RONALD E. MEHARG; LINDA GREEN; JOSHUA J. WESSEL; SEAN NIX; DONNA HULL, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:11-cv-00298-RAJ-DEM)

Submitted: September 7, 2012 Decided: September 17, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael A Scott, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Townzen Rezabek, LECLAIR RYAN, PC, Richmond, Virginia; Stanley Graves Barr, Jr., Andrew Kelly Rudiger, KAUFMAN & CANOLES, PC, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Michael A. Scott appeals the district court’s order granting the Appellants’ motion to dismiss and for summary judgment and dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Scott v. Lender Processing Servs., Inc., No. 2:11-cv-00298-RAJ-DEM (E.D. Va. April 2, 2012). We grant Scott’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.