Samuel Burt v. Jon Ozmint
Samuel Burt v. Jon Ozmint
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6821
SAMUEL BURT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JON OZMINT, Director; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; W. EAGLETON; S. SKIPPER; J. SLIGH; J. BETHEA; W. MCCRAE; MR. JACOBS; S. GOLDBERG; M. C. LINDSEY; C.
FLORIAN; MS. HOOKS, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:11-cv-00247-SB)
Submitted: September 27, 2012 Decided: October 1, 2012
Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Samuel Burt, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel F. Arthur, III, AIKEN, BRIDGES, NUNN, ELLIOTT & TYLER, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Samuel Burt appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Burt v. Ozmint, No. 3:11-cv-00247-SB (D.S.C. Mar. 27, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.