United States v. Kenneth Hughes
United States v. Kenneth Hughes
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6808
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. KENNETH BRONSON HUGHES, a/k/a Andrew Alfonso Skeeter, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (6:02-cr-70105-NKM-2)
Submitted: September 27, 2012 Decided: October 1, 2012
Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kenneth Bronson Hughes, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Andrew Bassford, Donald Ray Wolthuis, Assistant United States Attorneys, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Kenneth Bronson Hughes appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006), and for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hughes, No. 6:02-cr-70105-NKM-2 (W.D. Va. Mar. 30, 2012; Apr. 12, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.