Edmond Machie v. Amber Ullah
Edmond Machie v. Amber Ullah
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1556
EDMOND MACHIE, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. AMBER ULLAH, Collector, Fairfax County Federal Credit Union; GUSTAVO FERNANDEZ, Collector, Fairfax County Federal Credit Union; PATRICK MCINERENEY, Collector, Fairfax County Federal Credit Union; DONALD E. COULTER, Esquire, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, District Judge. (1:12-cv-00010-AJT-IDD)
Submitted: October 11, 2012 Decided: October 15, 2012
Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edmond Machie, Appellant Pro Se. Richard D. Holzheimer, Jr., Amy Sanborn Owen, COCHRAN & OWEN, LLC, Vienna, Virginia; John Elphinstone McIntosh, Jr., Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Edmond Machie appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for an extension of time and dismissing his civil complaint. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).
Because Machie’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Machie has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.